🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to safeguard women from abuse, covering family violence, following prolonged and heated debates in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in Riga this week to oppose the vote. The ultimate authority now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last year, requiring authorities to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all forms of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to initiate the process of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant setback for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its emphasis on gender equality weakens traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move sponsored by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary parties supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official urged the agreement not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's vote has provoked widespread outcry both within Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a Latvian appeal demanding the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a protest for the coming week, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a rash decision fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty in 2021, instances of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority majority, the head of state could potentially return the legislation for additional consideration if he has concerns.

Head of State the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the decision according to legal principles, "taking into account state and legal factors, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout Europe," stated a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse rates have been increasing in multiple European countries
• The Istanbul Convention requires specific legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could influence similar discussions in additional EU countries